Science Quiz
After much deliberation, I choose to purchase Answers In Genesis’s God’s Design for Chemistry series for our science this year. As it is designed for Grades 3-8, it is a bit of a stretch for our young family. I figured my (young-for-her-grade) 3rd grader would grasp most of it and my first grader would be along for the ride. They both love experiments and the texts (Properties of Matter & Properties of Atoms & Molecules) have a fun activity or experiment almost every single lesson.
Both have really struggled grasping the concepts. I didn’t realize how much trouble they would have. The first quiz (Lessons 1-4 in Properties of Matter book) didn’t go the greatest. But the second was really dismal. The older child grasp the concepts as shown in the short answer portion of the quiz but doesn’t have a clue on the terminology. The younger child can figure out the terminology as shown by her fairly decent score in the matching portion of the quiz but doesn’t get the underlying concept.
But that’s not why I’m posting about this. I just wanted to share Child #2’s answer on one of the “short answer” questions because it had me rolling with laughter. I must set this up by saying that 1) we studied astronomy last year and 2) the chemistry text discussed the concept of buoyancy with examples of swimming in a pool filled with rubbing alcohol (where we would likely have issues staying afloat) and a pool filled with mercury (which would be a bad idea, obviously, but where we would easily stay afloat) due to the different material densities.
Quiz question: “If an object floats in one liquid but sinks in another, what does that tell you about the densities of the two liquids?”
Child #2 answer, “The one that sinks is probably rubbing alcohol and the other is probably Saturn or Uranus or something you can float on.”
[Obviously, she was trying to think of the word "mercury" and substituted names of two other planets instead.] Is this funny to anyone else or is it one of those “you had to be there” moments?
Kindergarten Readiness
I know this is the wrong season for posting about “kindergarten readiness.” But this has been sitting on my computer desk for awhile and I’m finally getting around to it.
We receive a newsletter from our pediatrician’s office quarterly. There are usually articles about keeping kids healthy, preventative safety tips, and an article on a health topic (immunizations, out-patient treatments for whatever, symptoms of the most recent outbreak disease, etc.). On the back of this particular one, there was an article about “Kindergarten Readiness.”
They went into general indications your child is ready in such areas as behavior, verbal ability, and motor skills. The last paragraph was what stood out to me. See what you think:
“Remember, the object of kindergarten is not to make your child a star in the academic Olympics. It is to guide your child to the overall maturity that is needed for a solid start to a good education.”
Comments are welcome.
School Status
I planned to do no school this month. However, a couple of weeks ago, I felt really good with how we were doing with the new arrival. I thought about it and figured that starting one “fun” subject would be ok. So, we started doing history using Story of the World 2. We just started Chapter 4 on Thursday and we are going pretty slow – using my lesson plans but spreading the work out over a couple of days. This has been good since I have a LOT of books for most of these chapters, so we do read-alouds most days.
We’ve “eaten like Roman soldiers” and recently also “eaten like monks.” We’ve made our own ink and quill pens. We’re learning to draw mythical creatures from a book we checked out to see how to draw Grendel from the Beowulf story. (Child #2 is very artistic.)
This past week, we also started our religious studies. So, if I feel adventurous, we’ll add science this week. I still have a few weeks until I planned to start “full school,” so whatever we get done now is “gravy.” The kids love history & science, so they enjoy it and I still have time to keep up with the laundry, house, and feeding a newborn.
The Waiting Game
A neighbor stopped my husband the other night when he was taking two of the children for a walk to ask if we had “a new baby” yet. My husband looked at her blankly for a moment and then curtly said, “no.”
I usually tell people I’m due a week or two later than my actual due date so as to keep this type of questioning to a minimum. The last two children, I haven’t done that and have ended up getting my share of the “haven’t you had the baby yet?” questions. I try to tell people that I don’t go (that) early. I don’t induce early. I don’t schedule c-sections. I usually have the child right before or right after my due date. I use the Prem method for determining estimated date of childbirth (EDC) and I’ve found it is much more accurate (for me) than the Naegele Rule that most people use to calculate an estimated due date (EDD).
The difference for some women is neglible. For me, it can be 7-12 days, which can mean the difference between a doctor pushing for an induced labor or letting the child continue to grow until it comes out on its own. Here’s the difference:
EDD (Naegele rule): Start with first day of the Last Menstrual Period (LMP), add seven days, add nine months. (Assumes ovulation on Day 14.)
EDC (Prem rule): Start with first day of overall thermal shift minus seven days, add nine months. (Assumes you are charting your basal body temp each morning.)
Most women don’t know their thermal shift (upward basal body temp pattern) or their day of ovulation, thus making it difficult to get an EDC using the Prem method.
In my case with this pregnancy, my EDD is 10 days before my EDC. The ultrasound we had at ~ 20 weeks showed an EDD roughly 12 days before my EDC. I’ve calculated my EDC with four of five children. In three of the four deliveries so far, I’ve been -3 days (vs. +7/+ 5 for EDD) for two of them and + 1 day (vs. + 8 days for EDD) for one. We’ll see how this one turns out.
Either way, I’m in that “waiting” period with plenty of things still on my ‘to do’ list. If I went into labor early, all required tasks are complete. The to do list at this point includes only “nice to haves” that either can be left incomplete or my spouse can do them himself.
I always say that they are easier to take care of inside than they are once they are out! The only thing is planning in terms of taking care of the other children and my spouse’s work schedule. We have contingencies for each, but a delivery within a certain “window” of days (and time of day) is easier.
But we’ll take it whenever it comes out – convenient or not.
Comments (1)
Leave a Comment
Leave a Comment